Functional, not part-wise" could be MVP.

from [/unnamedcamp/ “functional, not component-like” may be MVP](https://scrapbox.io/unnamedcamp/ “functional, not component-like” may be MVP).

• It’s not “writing in parts.”

• If you describe writing atomic as “writing in parts”, the image is somewhat off. It seems to me that it cannot accomplish anything on its own. Rather, “let’s write it functionally” is closer to “let’s write it functionally.

• I think it would be beneficial to delve into what feels strange about “component-like” and why it feels right if it’s “functional.”
  • Basic premise: Both “component” and “functional” are metaphors, so please don’t break reverse Jenga (game) by saying “that’s not what I think the word means” or something. These are “[Metaphors are hooks for catching fish.
  • Partial = nothing can be done alone
    • That is, functional = can do something on its own.
  • Isn’t that what this is?
    • - Understand the meaning of MVP
  • The idea is to create something that can stand alone from the start, rather than to create pages that cannot stand alone and are parts of other things in advance.

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/「部品的ではなく関数的」はMVPかも using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.